2016 Federal Election

Updated: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 1:36:25 PM AEST

Wamboin - polling place

  • Wamboin Community Association Hall, 112 Bingley Way, WAMBOIN NSW 2620

This table provides the number and percentage of first preference votes for candidates in a specific polling place. The data includes swing - the percentage of first preference votes received compared to the previous election.

This table is sortable by selecting on column headers.

Notes:

  1. These results are final.
First preferences
Candidate Party Votes % Swing (%)
GROSMAIRE, Daniel Independent 17 2.69 +2.69
BENNETT, Ursula Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) 9 1.42 +0.86
FRIEND, Don Veterans Party 10 1.58 +1.58
BUCKLEY, Ray Independent 6 0.95 +0.95
HENDY, Peter Liberal 259 40.98 -3.29
RYAN, Tamara The Greens 64 10.13 -5.23
SEYMOUR, Frankie Animal Justice Party 15 2.37 +2.37
THALER, Andrew Evan Independent 8 1.27 +1.27
KELLY, Mike Labor 244 38.61 +7.46
...... National Party of Australia 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Democratic Labour Party (DLP) 0 0.00 +0.00
...... CEC 0 0.00 -0.70
...... ON 0 0.00 -1.12
...... Australia First Party (NSW) Incorporated 0 0.00 +0.00
...... #Sustainable Australia 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Rise Up Australia Party 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Katter's Australian Party 0 0.00 -1.12
...... Palmer United Party 0 0.00 -1.82
...... Bullet Train For Australia 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Other 0 0.00 -3.91
Formal   632 97.08 +1.87
Informal   19 2.92 -1.87
Total   651 0.60 -0.14

This table provides the number and percentage of two candidate preferred (TCP) votes for candidates in a specific polling place. The data includes swing - the percentage of TCP votes received compared to the previous election.

Notes:

  1. Two candidate preferred or TCP is a count of the two leading candidates only - votes are recorded for a particular candidate if the preference on the ballot paper for that candidate is higher than the alternative TCP candidate, regardless of other preferences. The TCP count ultimately determines who wins the seat.
  2. These results are final.
Two candidate preferred
Candidate Party Votes Margin Votes (%) Swing (%)
HENDY, Peter Liberal 299 -34 47.31 -2.41
KELLY, Mike Labor 333 34 52.69 +2.41