Division Distribution of Preferences

Full Distribution of Preferences

Count

NEWNHAM
Robert A
(LDP)

BAILEY
Fran
(LP)

MITCHELL
Rob
(ALP)

KANE
David Scott
(DEM)

MEACHER
Steve
(GRN)

CRANSON
Ian
(FFP)

MCLENNAN
Rod
(CEC)

TRUEMAN
Darren
(IND)

TOTAL

Votes

FIRST

806

0.83

44,231

45.77

38,856

40.20

951

0.98

8,387

8.68

2,404

2.49

162

0.17

850

0.88

96,647

SECOND

4.32

11.73

5.56

14.20

22.22

EXCLUDED

30.25

162

TOTAL

813

0.84

44,250

45.79

38,875

40.22

960

0.99

8,410

8.70

2,440

2.52

899

0.93

96,647

THIRD

EXCLUDED

438

53.87

193

23.74

6.64

6.52

4.92

4.31

813

TOTAL

44,688

46.24

39,068

40.42

1,014

1.05

8,463

8.76

2,480

2.57

934

0.97

96,647

FOURTH

203

21.73

154

16.49

104

11.13

154

16.49

319

34.15

EXCLUDED

934

TOTAL

44,891

46.45

39,222

40.58

1,118

1.16

8,617

8.92

2,799

2.90

96,647

FIFTH

231

20.66

320

28.62

EXCLUDED

411

36.76

156

13.95

1,118

TOTAL

45,122

46.69

39,542

40.91

9,028

9.34

2,955

3.06

96,647

SIXTH

1,494

50.56

621

21.02

840

28.43

EXCLUDED

2,955

TOTAL

46,616

48.23

40,163

41.56

9,868

10.21

96,647

SEVENTH

1,723

17.46

8,145

82.54

EXCLUDED

9,868

TOTAL

48,339

50.02

48,308

49.98

96,647

ELECTED

Help

This screen shows the result of the distribution of preferences for each division. On this screen you will find...

the candidates that contested the election for a division and the party they were endorsed by (if any)
the first preference votes for each candidate
the candidate excluded at each count
the number of votes distributed to each of the remaining candidates from the candidate excluded at each count
the number of votes distributed to each candidate expressed as a percentage of the total votes distributed at that count
the progressive total of votes each remaining candidate has after the distribution of votes has been completed for each count
the progressive total of votes for each candidate expressed as a percentage of the total votes for the division
the Member elected for each division.

Notes:

The above tally does not correspond with the tally set out in paragraph 84 of the reasons for judgment of the Court of Disputed Returns in Mitchell v Bailey (No.2) [2008] FCA 692. The reasons for this being that the Court was unable to determine which candidate had been allocated the preference in three of the ballot-papers which were found to be informal by the Court, although the AEC was aware that all three preferences from those ballot-papers had been allocated to Mr Mitchell. Also, in relation to one other ballot-paper, the Court treated it as having been wrongly rejected in the re-count when it had in fact been admitted. The result on the tally as calculated by the Court is a net reduction in Mr Mitchell's count by four votes, leading to a final two party preferred majority of 31 votes for Ms Bailey.
These results are final.

VIC DIVISION - MCEWEN

Help

Notes: