2016 Federal Election

Updated: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 3:49:00 PM AEST

Queanbeyan South - polling place

  • Queanbeyan South Public School, 101 Cameron Rd, KARABAR NSW 2620

This table provides the number and percentage of first preference votes for candidates in a specific polling place. The data includes swing - the percentage of first preference votes received compared to the previous election.

This table is sortable by selecting on column headers.

Notes:

  1. These results are final.
First preferences
Candidate Party Votes % Swing (%)
GROSMAIRE, Daniel Independent 58 2.84 +2.84
BENNETT, Ursula Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) 28 1.37 +0.09
FRIEND, Don Veterans Party 46 2.25 +2.25
BUCKLEY, Ray Independent 16 0.78 +0.78
HENDY, Peter Liberal 582 28.46 -5.12
RYAN, Tamara The Greens 114 5.57 +0.06
SEYMOUR, Frankie Animal Justice Party 42 2.05 +2.05
THALER, Andrew Evan Independent 17 0.83 -0.57
KELLY, Mike Labor 1,142 55.84 +4.31
...... National Party of Australia 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Democratic Labour Party (DLP) 0 0.00 +0.00
...... CEC 0 0.00 -0.29
...... ON 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Australia First Party (NSW) Incorporated 0 0.00 +0.00
...... #Sustainable Australia 0 0.00 -0.89
...... Rise Up Australia Party 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Katter's Australian Party 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Palmer United Party 0 0.00 -5.52
...... Bullet Train For Australia 0 0.00 +0.00
...... Other 0 0.00 +0.00
Formal   2,045 91.83 -0.44
Informal   182 8.17 +0.44
Total   2,227 2.07 -0.04

This table provides the number and percentage of two candidate preferred (TCP) votes for candidates in a specific polling place. The data includes swing - the percentage of TCP votes received compared to the previous election.

Notes:

  1. Two candidate preferred or TCP is a count of the two leading candidates only - votes are recorded for a particular candidate if the preference on the ballot paper for that candidate is higher than the alternative TCP candidate, regardless of other preferences. The TCP count ultimately determines who wins the seat.
  2. These results are final.
Two candidate preferred
Candidate Party Votes Margin Votes (%) Swing (%)
HENDY, Peter Liberal 699 -647 34.18 -4.65
KELLY, Mike Labor 1,346 647 65.82 +4.65